Style Spreads and Trends, 2011-2014

Posted on Posted in competition, homebrew 4 Comments

Earlier this year, David Bishop (otherwise known as @broadfordbrewer) put together an excellent article on the “State of UK Homebrewing“. He kindly asked me to give my take – and I concentrated a bit on what people like to brew, and what might be trends in the coming year or so. Ali Kocho-Williams, as organiser of the UK National Homebrew Competition has kindly allowed me access to use data from the last 4 competitions to do a bit of analysis to see if there are any trends (going into this I had some suspicions).

Jumping straight into it, here’s a table of entries by category for the last 4 years. (Table is responsive, and on a larger screen sortable by each column.)

BJCP Cat 2011 entries 2011 % 2012 entries 2012 % 2012 % change 2013 entries 2013 % 2013 % change 2014 entries 2014 % 2014 % change
1 – Light Lager 2 0.8 2 0.4 -44.2 4 0.9 109.5 4 1.1 18.2
2 – Pilsner 5 1.9 3 0.6 -66.5 5 1.1 74.6 5 1.3 18.2
3 – Amber Lager 2 0.8 8 1.7 123.4 6 1.4 -21.4 1 0.3 -80.3
4 – Dark Lager 3 1.2 2 0.4 -62.8 5 1.1 161.9 6 1.6 41.9
5 – Bock 1 0.4 5 1.1 179.2 6 1.4 25.7 3 0.8 -40.9
6 – Light Hybrid 5 1.9 16 3.5 78.7 17 3.9 11.3 13 3.5 -9.6
7 – Dark Hybrid 2 0.8 8 1.7 123.4 4 0.9 -47.6 2 0.5 -40.9
8 – Pale Ale 49 19.0 57 12.3 -35.0 29 6.6 -46.7 23 6.2 -6.2
9 – Scot/Irish 4 1.6 7 1.5 -2.3 4 0.9 -40.1 4 1.1 18.2
10 – American Ales 39 15.1 37 8.0 -47.0 34 7.7 -3.7 38 10.2 32.1
11 – Brown Ales 3 1.2 5 1.1 -6.9 12 2.7 151.4 11 2.9 8.4
12 – Porter 17 6.6 26 5.6 -14.6 30 6.8 20.9 19 5.1 -25.1
13 – Stout 22 8.5 43 9.3 9.1 46 10.4 12.1 27 7.2 -30.6
14 – IPA 27 10.5 58 12.6 20.0 52 11.8 -6.1 38 10.2 -13.6
15 – Wheat 5 1.9 15 3.2 67.5 15 3.4 4.8 9 2.4 -29.1
16 – French/Belgian 21 8.1 46 10.0 22.3 47 10.7 7.0 43 11.5 8.2
17 – Sour 2 0.8 2 0.4 -44.2 5 1.1 161.9 15 4.0 254.7
18 – Strong Belgian 12 4.7 28 6.1 30.3 25 5.7 -6.5 28 7.5 32.4
19 – Strong Ales 10 3.9 14 3.0 -21.8 24 5.4 79.6 13 3.5 -36.0
20 – Fruit 2 0.8 8 1.7 123.4 5 1.1 -34.5 6 1.6 41.9
21 – SHV 5 1.9 17 3.7 89.9 14 3.2 -13.7 9 2.4 -24.0
22 – Wood 10 3.9 16 3.5 -10.6 18 4.1 17.9 22 5.9 44.5
23 – Specialty 10 3.9 39 8.4 117.8 34 7.7 -8.7 34 9.1 18.2

NB: In 2013, NZ Pale Ales was a separate category – I have merged this with Specialty for comparison purposes.

Winning Best of Show beers have come from:

2011: Spice, Herb, Vegetable (Vanilla Stout)
2012: Schwarzbier
2013: Straight Lambic
2014: Munich Helles

Plotting the changes as a bar chart we get the following:

style_percentage_changes

Many of these styles have small entry numbers, and so the changes aren’t necessarily statistically significant (or need little variation to show wild changes). However, worthy of note are:

  • Year on year reduction of the number of Pale Ales (Category 8)
  • Two big increases in Sours (Category 17)
  • Two consecutive increases in the number of wood-aged beers (Category 22)
  • Three increases in French and Belgian Ales [“Powered by Saison!!”]
  • Sudden increase in Specialty entries (Category 23) which has remained at 2012 levels since [I think this was due to people getting to realise how the style guidelines worked]

and more general observations:

  • How few lagers are entered (just 16 (5% of total) in 2014) – fluctuations here are large in percentage terms, but not in real numbers.
  • Only 9 wheat beers entered in 2014 – these entry numbers appear consistently low [why?]

More interesting are some subcategory splits (I’m not going to bore you with all the splits here...):

IPA:

Subcat 2011 2012 2013 2014
14A – English IPA 11 13 6 3
14B – American IPA 12 30 30 30
14C – Imperial IPA 4 15 16 8

Where have all the English IPAs gone to? Similarly, I’m a little surprised to see such a marked drop in Imperial IPAs this year.

Stouts:

Subcat 2011 2012 2013 2014
13A – Dry stout 7 12 7 5
13B – Sweet Stout 0 4 2 2
13C – Oatmeal Stout 4 5 10 2
13D – Foreign Extra Stout 2 2 4 2
13E – American Stout 3 2 5 0
13F – Imperial Stout 6 18 18 18

I’m surprised there have been so few American Stouts entered (with *none* this year (2014)) – and there is a strong bias to Imperial Stouts. Why are there relatively so few sweet, oatmeal and foreign extra stouts? [The decrease in these is pretty much the cause of the percentage decrease in category 13 in 2014.]

Pale Ales:

Subcat 2011 2012 2013 2014
8A – Ordinary Bitter 10 8 5 4
8B – Best Bitter 15 24 16 14
8C – “ESB” (Strong bitter) 24 25 8 5

A clear decline shows in the numbers of English Pale Ale styles being entered – and though I’m not *so* surprised by the Ordinary Bitters, what is going on with Strong Bitters?

These figures are obviously only concerned with the entries into the National Competition, and while I don’t think it’s quite reached the point where we can declare the death of bitters and English pale ales in the homebrewing community, trends towards experimentation with wood aging, sour beers and a strong shift in balance in stronger ales towards US styles show that homebrewers are continuing to push the boundaries of their brewing away from more “standard” styles. I think it is also apparent that there is a symbiosis between the commercial sector and homebrewers – there is a two way feed of inspiration between the two (unsurprising given the background of many brewers who have made the leap from homebrew to commercial).

Is this a case of the brewers being partly inspired by guidelines here? If you offer entrants a wide variety of classes to enter,  will they be more likely to enter in those classes? And what of British hop varieties? In the most part homebrewers might appear to have abandoned them a little here – though I hope this isn’t the case – they have so much more to offer than the uninspiring “twiggy” bitter.

While thinking about this post, I also managed to find the following old sheet of entries from the 2009 Sutton competition which makes interesting reading.

2009 Sutton Brewing Festival EntriesA lot of familiar names on there, but a massive slant towards bitters, etc. It may well be the type of competition that encourages this type of entry, but there were no categories to enter in this, and no broad range of BJCP guidelines to judge against. Very few “US” style beers are entered here, though arguably, this was also before the massive range of ingredients was perhaps as widely available as they are now.

Either way, I think it’s clear just how far we have come in homebrewing in the last 5 years – the breadth and popularity have increased enormously and have helped to drive the boom in new breweries in this country.

Improving Through Brewing

If there has been a marked decline in the counts of bitters and (as I suspect), and a low number of lager category beers are actually being brewed, could this be having an adverse effect on the quality of UK homebrew? These are all great styles (especially the lighter lagers and lower alcohol bitters) for really testing your own skills as a brewer – there are few places to hide with these styles as any flaws make themselves apparent very easily.

Relatedly, Pete Brown (@PeteBrownBeer,) wrote not so long ago with regard to commercial brewers:

and there’s a lot of sense in that – to improve, it helps to brew a lot of beer, but also to brew beer styles that help you master the fundamentals and being able to cast a critical eye over your own beer. Many of the (currently) more popular styles can easily “hide” faults (dry hopping, lots of roast malt, high ABV, etc) – it’s not to say that they are bad styles as such, and they are certainly popular. And I certainly don’t want to see less variety and innovation from UK homebrewers (far from it in fact) – but in line with Pete’s thinking, I believe it wouldn’t hurt for all brewers to return to simple, harder to nail recipes to really check out their brewing skills. Brewing as a hobby and business should not sacrifice quality for innovation – the two must go hand in hand.

Arguably, some of the hardest beers to brew are some of the simplest – beers such as (American) Budweiser, with its consistency across multiple sites coupled with the beer’s profile, make it a challenge to brew, especially on large scale. Even if not the most flavoursome, beers like “Bud” are arguably one of the greatest challenges for any homebrewer to take on.

Summary

So where are we? Well, I think homebrewing is certainly in a very strong position – I think it is as strong as ever with great innovation being shown by many. But let’s just not lose sight of the fact that the quality of the beer you produce (be it commercial or homebrew) should be paramount. While I think innovation and creativity in brewing beer at home is fantastic, it can’t be without a desire for continuous improvement in quality. Going “back to basics” as a homebrewer (and commercial!) can be of benefit to really fine tune brewing technique and skills,and to really challenge yourself – and for the commercial, I think there are several gaps in the market here – with a few exceptions there is a lack of many good examples of several of these types of beer in the UK market (eg. dunkel, “Kölsch style”, Märzen).

As always, comments much appreciated...

4 Comments on “Style Spreads and Trends, 2011-2014”

  1. Some interesting comments.

    A few things I’d include:

    The rule change introduced in 2013 to prevent category flooding may account for some of these changes. This was introduced after some entrants had multiple beers in the same subcategories (I recall one run of fruit beers that were the same base beer with different fruits, and a large number of Best Bitters from the same person).

    I suspect that economics of entry fees and shipping beer accounts for some of these shifts. In 2011 and 2012, judges and stewards were allowed to bring entries on the day, often for other people (over 100 entries were brought on the morning of the competition in 2012 from judges from London Amateur Brewers). This was stopped in 2013 as it creates enormous logistical problems for running a competition, and has led to a drop in entries from some people.

    With style drift, the substyles perhaps need a little more drilling into. I noted this year a large increase in Berliner Weiss driving sours up, which I put down partly to an increase in the availability of such beers (The Kernel’s London Sour for example), and to the publications coming out of the Brewers Association in recent years (Stan Hieronymous, Brewing with Wheat; Michael Tonsmierre, American Sour Ales), which has led people to be able to sample and then find relevant information and recipes to create their own.

    I also suspect people are becoming more competition savvy, and getting a better sense of what might hold up well in competition and what might not. I do wonder if this accounts for the drop in English Pale Ales entered, and the drop in English IPAs (where there is an assumption that often they won’t be competitive with the American versions). And likewise for stouts. The 2014 BJCP Guidelines revision makes an attempt to address some of this.

    Reply

    • Good points, Ali. I’d forgotten about the category changes which may account a bit for drops in places (examples noted!).

      I think you’re right about the economics (and potential inconvenience of shipping) which show themselves across the total entry counts – these have shown a drop since the 2012 peak, though this may also be due to the prize on offer that year too…!

      Regarding being competition-savvy – it’s a double edged sword. There is always the general assumption that bigger beers do better (which I think is backed up somewhat by competition statistics). But, this doesn’t necessarily make it easier to brew, and consequently do well with, especially if you haven’t quite got the basics nailed. I’m not sure that a good English IPA won’t hold it’s own against an American version, and likewise for sub-cats like American Stout vs Imperials (remember Fergus’ American Stout in London a few years back that unfortunately got entered wrongly into Imperials?), though it is a valid point. Clearly a similar idea isn’t holding true for 8C either (eg vs 8A/B) – only 3 this year… :-/

      Reply

  2. On the “styles that don’t hold up” – I agree that this isn’t necessarily the case, but that is often peoples’ perceptions. Those perceptions influence what people enter.

    I suspect that the drop in Imperial IPAs is that people are actually finding they are quite hard to brew well. It would be interesting (although a much bigger task) to see entry counts versus high and low scores and mean and modal averages.

    I do still feel, though, that people don’t pay enough attention to the guidelines with some of the more out there beers. Things go in the wrong place, and often lack suitable descriptors to give the judges the information they need. Much of what goes in to speciality should be in other categories, and some things in others should have gone into specialty….

    But good work. Let’s see what 2015 brings.

    Reply

  3. Agree on the guideline reading – be interesting next year if we have the 2014 revisions by then…

    The min/max/averages might be easy to do with a JOIN or two – I’ll have a go when I get chance.

    Reply

Leave a Reply